Search for: "United States v. Carbone" Results 201 - 220 of 682
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2010, 7:52 am by Jonathan H. Adler
As it stands, the bill is not in the economic nor environmental interest of the United States. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
HACKER AND PAUL PIERSON New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks, 2011, c2010 HN89.S6 H33 2011 See Catalog Carbon offsetting -- Law and legislation CARBON TRADING LAW AND PRACTICE / SCOTT D. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am by rbm3
HACKER AND PAUL PIERSON New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks, 2011, c2010 HN89.S6 H33 2011 See Catalog Carbon offsetting -- Law and legislation CARBON TRADING LAW AND PRACTICE / SCOTT D. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 10:31 am by Dennis Crouch
§ 1498(a) provides that “the owner’s remedy shall be by action against the United States in the United States Court of Federal Claims for the recovery of his reasonable and entire compensation for such use and manufacture. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:39 am by Guest Blogger
  Construing a state regulation as “environmental” doesn’t insulate it from Commerce Clause review, as the town of Clarkstown, New York found out in C&A Carbone, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
The Durban Conference of the Parties (COP17) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is finally over two days after talks were scheduled to conclude. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:13 am
s email contact list,as well as blind carbon copying A.R.' [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:05 am by Tom Merrill
United States, 459 U.S. 131 (1982), the Supreme Court held that when an agency issues sequential decisions, reversal by a court of a later decision does not automatically reinstate an earlier one. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 11:58 am
In 1999 the respondent began to investigate allegations of price-fixing in the carbon industry in the United States. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:53 am by Nabiha Syed
United States, in which the Court also heard oral argument yesterday. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 9:09 am by Steven Boutwell
She also indicated that EPA was required to address whether GHGs endanger public health and welfare pursuant to the United States Supreme Court decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]