Search for: "United States v. Carbone" Results 261 - 280 of 714
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm by Nicholas Bellos
The Trump Administration’s decision to repeal the Clean Power Plan, the major Obama-era carbon emissions regulation, has reignited questions about the future of federal environmental protection in the United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:30 am
United States Koreans Becoming Younger – Unification of Age-Counting Systems Congress.gov January 2023 New, Tip, and Top Syndication Regulation and TV’s Big Three: Broadcasting Regulations and 1970s Television The Global Legal Monitor is our online publication covering legal news and developments worldwide. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:52 am by John Jascob
”The Court also noted that the CPP “essentially adopted a cap-and-trade scheme, or set of state cap-and-trade schemes, for carbon. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Should the state attorneys general have investigated Starbucks for not proclaiming the warnings of WHO? [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 11:19 am by Rob Jordan
Barton “Buzz” Thompson served as special master for the United States Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 10:34 am
To tolerate imprecision just short of that render­ ing a claim “insolubly ambiguous” would diminish the definiteness requirement’s public-notice function and foster the innovation-discouraging “zone of uncertainty,” United Carbon, 317 U. [read post]
2 May 2007, 7:01 am
  In another case, eight states, the City of New York, and three land trusts have sued the utilities that are the five largest carbon dioxide largest emitters in the United States. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 5:30 am by Kevin
It would have no real effect inside Montana, either, unlike carbon dioxide. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 1:02 pm by WIMS
" There were no cosponsors to the bill which was referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Chaired by Representative Henry Waxman (D-CA).On April 2, 2007, the United States Supreme Court, in Massachusetts v. [read post]