Search for: "United States v. Carbone"
Results 81 - 100
of 683
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2019, 12:00 am
” The plaintiffs allege that the United States government knows, yet continues to ignore, that carbon dioxide emissions from the burning of fossil fuels destabilize the climate. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 11:27 am
Reversed and remanded in part.Case Name: EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 1:07 pm
The United States may adopt this "cap and trade" system. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 11:38 am
United States and his concurring opinion in NFIB v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:05 pm
In its 2011 AEP v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm
.** In American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 2:22 pm
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2022.html United States of America v. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
Tuberculosis trends—United States, 2014. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:02 am
United States. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
Despite the recent announcement that Volkswagen had agreed to a $14.7 billion settlement with the United States arising out of allegations made by the U.S. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:34 pm
On consideration, in brief summary, the Appeals Court Order indicates, "The petition of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, joined by the State of Alaska, Peabody Energy Company, Southeastern Legal Foundation, et al., State Petitioners and Intervenors for Petitioners, for rehearing en banc; and the petition of the National Association of Manufacturers, et al. for rehearing en banc in No. 10-1073, et al. and No. 10-1167, et… [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:48 pm
After a four-day bench trial, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware found claim 8 of U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 3:05 pm
Find all of the latest updates at narf.org/nill/bulletins/Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2020.htmlUnited States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 12:06 pm
State of North Dakota, 2022 ND 150. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
Pa. 1997); United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
Pa. 1997); United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 1:16 pm
The dissent argued that the certified order from the Court of Federal Claims did not confer appellate jurisdiction over the earlier dismissal of infringement claims against the United States, citing United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court—in Hughes v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
(citation omitted).2 Öcalan v. [read post]
