Search for: "United States v. Carbone" Results 161 - 180 of 653
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am by Frank Pasquale
(Review of Ian Bremmer, The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations? [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Amy Howe
United States applies retroactively. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 8:43 am by WIMS
Further closures of U.S. nuclear power plants will make it harder for the United States to reduce carbon emissions and meet its climate goals, the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES) says in a new policy brief. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:35 am by WIMS
Waxman Statement on Supreme Court's Decision in UARG v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:03 pm by Jeffrey B. Gracer
In a significant and surprising development, on August 24 the Solicitor General of the United States filed a brief in the Supreme Court asserting that a groundbreaking climate change decision by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals should be vacated and remanded for further consideration. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:58 pm
  Procedural HistoryNooren brought the present action against Amcorr in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, alleging infringement of the '044 patent. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 3:58 pm
In Monday's oral arguments in No. 05-1345, United Haulers Ass'n v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:40 pm by William A. Ruskin
Connecticut the United States Supreme Court may indeed transform the way we produce and obtain energy. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:49 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Asarco LLC v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 2:38 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States  (Federal Fiduciary Duty)Northern Natural Gas Company v. 80 Acres of Land in Thurston County  (Rights-of-Way)Wilhite v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:02 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> State of Veracruz v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 12:19 pm by WIMS
Supreme Court in the landmark case, Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association et al v. [read post]