Search for: "United States v. Carlton" Results 41 - 60 of 128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2019, 7:03 am by Howard Bashman
United States, No. 17-6086, and issued an opinion in which Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am by Andrew Hamm
United States, McDonough v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Paul Caron
Fatale (Massachusetts Department of Revenue), Connecting the Dot: Retroactive State Tax Statutes Revisit United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:06 am by Christopher Walker
Rachel Kovner, representing the United States as amicus curiae in support of Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, brought much clarity to the argument. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:34 am by Christopher Walker
United States fame, returns to the court as a law-professor amicus. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:45 am by Leila Wozniak
Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc., No. 17-1705, 2018 WL 3127423, at *1 (U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 10:04 am by Ruthann Robson
Currier, United States District Judge Carlton Reeves enjoined the Mississippi law banning abortions after 15 weeks as unconstitutional. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a challenge to a “doctrine [that] bars active-duty service members from bringing any claims of medical malpractice against the military. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 1:29 pm by Rafael Reyneri
Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Carlton & Harris Chiropractic, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-8995, involves the truly obscure question of whether a period of supervised release for one offense is tolled during a period of pretrial confinement (that, upon conviction, would be credited to a defendant’s term of imprisonment for another offense). [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 12 conference)   United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by John Elwood
Carlton & Harris Chiropractic Inc., 17-1705. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
Such written agreement must state that it will be the responsibility of the adoptive parent(s) to inform the appropriate State or local official when they are no longer legally responsible for the child or no longer providing any support to the child” (18 NYCRR 421.24[c][5]). [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
Such written agreement must state that it will be the responsibility of the adoptive parent(s) to inform the appropriate State or local official when they are no longer legally responsible for the child or no longer providing any support to the child” (18 NYCRR 421.24[c][5]). [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices held 5-4 that the government ordinarily needs a warrant to access historical cell-site location information. [read post]