Search for: "United States v. Carr"
Results 1 - 20
of 341
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2009, 4:30 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari in Carr v. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 3:38 pm
United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:09 am
For essentially the reasons explained by the Court of Appeals, see United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:29 am
United States, which... [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:46 am
A good opinion recap of Carr v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 3:35 am
Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case which decided that federal courts had the power to rule on the constitutionality of reapportionment plans and decisions (that is, changes in the boundaries of voting districts) made by state governments. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 9:15 am
On April 22, 2021, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in Carr v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 8:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:42 pm
Carr v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 2:05 am
. ---: Brief for Petitioner Thomas Carr ---: Brief for National Association for Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of Petitioner ---: Brief for Law Professors in Support of Petitioner Earlier case which will be tested: CALDER v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:22 am
Strikes down the Defense of Marriage Act: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-307_g2bh.pdf SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus UNITED STATES v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 12:56 pm
United States (08-1301) and here for United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:09 pm
United States. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:09 pm
United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am
United States,... [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:56 am
Check the Carr v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:21 pm
7-1-2010 7th Circuit:From Sentencing, Law & Policy:A number of helpful readers have alerted me to a notable split Seventh Circuit opinion today in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:32 pm
United States and Mathis v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:00 pm
Check the Carr v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 7:10 pm
United States and United States v. [read post]
