Search for: "United States v. Cartwright" Results 1 - 20 of 61
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2009, 1:28 pm
On September 11, 2009, the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, issued a substantial class certification opinion in Cartwright, et al. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 3:42 pm by dbmadmin
The Cartwright Act is California’s state antitrust law. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 1:22 pm by Tom Smith
Speech First, a nonprofit membership association working to combat restrictions on free speech and other civil rights at colleges and universities across the United States, filed a lawsuit today against the University of Central Florida — Speech First v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 6:30 am by Howard Ullman
  The plaintiff developed and marketed a pharmaceutical product, and contracted with CoTherix to commercialize the product in the United States. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 7:41 am by msW1Ld
On December 21, 2010, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in Pecover v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 8:47 am
Stanford student Tiffany Cartwright summarizes Tuesday’s oral argument in Forest Grove v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 11:07 am by The Complex Litigator
 In 1978, in direct response to Illinois Brick, the California Legislature amended the state's Cartwright Act (Bus. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
  The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
  The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 11:16 pm by The Complex Litigator
This one entertains me becaues it faintly evokes the studio system of the 1930's and the decades of antitrust action by the FTC, with United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:31 am by Jack Sharman
Michael Landon (“Little Joe Cartwright”) being served with a subpoena (1968) Another useful Townsend post addresses a common issue — the Government’s attempt to muzzle the recipients of subpoenas: In United States v. [read post]
The plaintiffs in this case sought to certify a class of more than 250 purchasers of smartphones in the United States that contain Qualcomm chips, alleging that Qualcomm violated the Cartwright Act, California’s antitrust law. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 9:43 am by Cinthia Macie
The increasing consolidation has attracted scrutiny from the United States Department of Justice since 2019 (many have critiqued the DOJ’s involvement as animus from then Attorney General William Barr). [read post]