Search for: "United States v. Castro" Results 1 - 20 of 233
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2022, 8:43 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Supreme Court Merits Briefs: Petitioner’s Brief Respondent’s Brief Reply Merits Stage Amicus Briefs Supporting Petitioner: Oklahoma DAs and Sheriffs Amicus Brief Police Chiefs Amicus Brief Polluters Amicus Brief States Amicus Brief Supporting Oklahoma Tulsa Amicus Brief Merits Stage Amicus Briefs Supporting Respondent: United States Amicus Brief Five Tribes Amicus Brief NCAI Amicus Brief Former US Attys Amicus Brief … [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:56 am by Joel R. Brandes
Castro  failed to show that these measures or the protection of the Ecuadorian courts were inadequate, even if she remained in the United States; nor did she petition the district court to amend the terms of the JSU. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:57 am by Karen Hoffmann
They fled gender-based violence and threats to their lives in their home countries and sought asylum in the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 10:45 am
Presumably also after your prison term therefor.For better or worse, you've now (again) illegally entered the United States. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 8:46 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Castro-Huerta, the Court has articulated a preemption test that is determined by judicial balancing of the tribal, federal, and state interests in the subject matter the state seeks to regulate. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 12:54 pm by Immigration Prof
Steve Vladeck on Just Security writes about a spectacular new court of appeals decision: In a breathtaking 80-page opinion handed down today in Castro v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 7:15 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: respondents-brief-1Download United States Amicus Brief Five Tribes Amicus Brief NCAI Amicus Brief Former US Attys Amicus Brief Peace Commission Treaty Tribes Amicus Brief NIWRC Amicus Brief Scholars Amicus Brief Topside briefs here. [read post]
28 Jan 2003, 9:22 am
United States, raising the question of whether a lower court can recharacterize a motion as a habeas corpus application. [read post]