Search for: "United States v. Castro"
Results 81 - 100
of 256
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2021, 2:00 pm
(p. 29) In contrast, the ban only applies to foreign nationals who are seeking to enter the United States. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:56 am
Castro failed to show that these measures or the protection of the Ecuadorian courts were inadequate, even if she remained in the United States; nor did she petition the district court to amend the terms of the JSU. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:06 am
In Castro v Rentieria, --- F.3d ----, 2020 WL 4814137 (9th Cir., 2020) the district court denied Carmen Flores Castro’s petition for the return to Mexico of Z.F.M.Z., a ten-year-old child who was Carmen’s paternal half-sister. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
United States, demonstrates what not to do when it is time to sign an amended tax return. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 7:37 am
Case citation: U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 6:11 am
The court in Gonzalez was interpreting a provision in Title III stating that “[i]n the case of property confiscated before March 12, 1996, a United States national may not bring an action under [the Act] ... unless such national acquires ownership of the claim before March 12, 1996. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:12 pm
" A prime example of use of § 1182(f) from this function was Proclamation No. 5517 from 1986, in which President Reagan had suspended immigration from Cuba to push the Castro regime to live up to an immigration agreement with the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 1:39 pm
It draws its authority from the DNA Fingerprint Act of 2005, which granted the Attorney General power to direct federal agencies to collect DNA from “individuals who are arrested, facing charges, or convicted or from non-United States persons who are detained under the authority of the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
He escaped Sri Lanka to Mexico in June 2016 and in February 2017 crossed the border and entered the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 10:41 am
Those notions came to the United States with the waves of migration after the success of Fidel Castro's revolution in 1959. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 7:41 am
§ 1182(f), which permits the president to bar entry of foreign nationals that would be “detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 5:53 am
The opinion is styled, Michael Hebert v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 9:07 am
United StatesVazzo v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 5:02 am
From Castro v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:58 pm
§ 1182(f), authorizing the president to bar entry of foreign nationals “detrimental to the interests of the United States”—the same provision that Trump used for his travel ban, which the Supreme Court upheld in Trump v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Under Title III of that act, United States citizens who had their property confiscated by the Castro regime were given the right to file suit against those who traffic in such properties (See Libertad Act §§ 301-306). [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Joaquin Castro Tweeted the Names of Top Trump Donors. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 5:41 am
Overview The federal statute criminalizing illegal entry into the United States, 8 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 4:36 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 12:48 pm
when undertaken by other states. [read post]
