Search for: "United States v. Castro"
Results 101 - 120
of 220
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
Otah requested a bond hearing while he awaited removal from the United States and while his Petition for Review (PFR) was pending with the U.S. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:50 am
We simply think that the rights of ten million vehicle owners and lessees across the United States should not be adjudicated in an action brought by three plaintiffs who cannot show more than the merest possibility of injury to themselves. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 3:00 am
For the Court of Appeals' discussion of the legislative intent, Castro v United Container Mach. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 8:08 am
See, e.g., Larry Catá Backer, Emasculated Men, Effeminate Law in the United States, Zimbabwe and Malaysia. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:44 am
Throughout their time in the United States, Respondent has ensured that AC kept in contact with her father. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:07 am
Nevertheless, the Second Circuit upheld the BIA’s decision not to grant administrative closure under Matter of Castro-Tum in Garcia v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
The Omnipresent State Sector 552 2. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 9:38 am
Seaboard Marine, Ltd., Slip Copy, 2021 WL 4902506 (United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 8:28 am
Araque, 2023 WL 11959851, United States District Court, D. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 4:36 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
United States, 296 F.3d 1237 (11th Cir. 2002). [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 1:22 pm
See, e.g., Castro v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 4:40 pm
—John Erskine 1Castro v. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 6:30 pm
Marin, Marguerite V. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:55 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 6:22 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 5:29 am
Claude Castro & Assoc. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Gonzales, 431 F.3d 319 (8th Cir. 2005)), and Mexico (Castro-Martinez v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:16 am
United States, 540 U.S. 375, 383, 124 S. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Supreme Court in Worcester v. [read post]