Search for: "United States v. Central Motor Lines, Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
. — F.Supp.2d —-, 2007 WL 43747 (S.D.Ohio) United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 12:07 pm by Mara Curtis and Michael Kleinmann
CA’s decision in Western States Trucking, the United States District Court for the Central District of California (“C.D. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am by Dan Carvajal
Wayfair that South Dakota can require collection of its sales tax on sales to its residents by out-of-state internet retailers.[2] The 5 to 4 decision overruled two earlier precedents, National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 11:59 am
 For purposes of the Graves Amendment, section 30102(a)(6) of Chapter 301 of Title 49 of the United States Code, entitled Motor Vehicle Safety, defines "motor vehicle" as "a vehicle driven or drawn by mechanical power and manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways, but does not include a vehicle operated only on a rail line. [read post]
28 May 2020, 4:51 pm by Adam Rosenthal and Robert Foster
Hours of Service Regulations The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (“FMCSA”), which falls under the United States Department of Transportation (“DOT”), is responsible for developing and enforcing Hours of Service (“HOS”) regulations for the trucking industry. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 9:22 am by Jack Pringle
The opinion and its result rests not on the application of South Carolina statutory or case law, but instead a line of United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) cases applying the FAA to disputes over agreements to arbitrate. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am by Mark Zamora
App. 558, 559-60 (1986); United Motor Freight Terminal Company Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm by admin
Detroit,3 the Michigan Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the taking of private property for the construction of a General Motors automotive plant. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:07 pm
The Act also rejects the standards set forth by the Supreme Court in Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]