Search for: "United States v. Certain Real Property Situated at Route 3"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
But in certain circumstances, such equality of arms may have to be dispensed with in order to achieve real justice and a fair trial. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
. — F.Supp.2d —-, 2007 WL 43747 (S.D.Ohio) United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 2:18 pm
D. and A. v United Kingdom 32949/17 34614/17 The Supreme Court (Lady Hale and Lord Carnwath dissenting) found justified discrimination in imposing the bedroom tax on a woman who, as a result of domestic violence, had had her home treated under the Sanctuary Scheme to include the modification of the attic to render it a “panic room”. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm
Call a personal injury attorney immediately, not a real estate attorney. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
In my post about Prenda Law's defamation lawsuits, I mentioned that Prenda is facing an inquiry by United States District Judge Otis Wright in Los Angeles. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 1:58 pm
That invitation constitutes the bulk of a recent press release of the International Court of Justice: (Press Release; Unofficial [No. 2024/1] 3 January 2024).Proceedings instituted by South Africa against Israel on 29 December 2023Request for the indication of provisional measuresPublic hearings to be held on Thursday 11 and Friday 12 January 2024THE HAGUE, 3 January 2024. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
For the U.S. it suggests the need for a more strategic multilateralism along its won trade routes and among its own trade partners--one with an equally compelling need for greater harmonization. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
Make no mistake about it: The Chinese government is in the business of collecting data at scale, and the United States is its prime target. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
In 1974, the County adopted a rezoning measure that reduced how many residences Martha could build on its property. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
The City argued the project was ineligible for the following reasons: (1) the project violated the City’s requirements that projects meet certain performance standards for off-site impacts and not exceed certain amount and intensity of use requirements; (2) the project was located within a three-block area designated as a City Landmark for the state-listed historical resource known as the West Berkeley Shellmound (“Shellmound”), and would have, thus,… [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 12:55 am
She could, however, extricate herself from the situation by stating to them unequivocally that she considered the notice to quit to be valid irrespective of how it had been obtained. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 12:55 am
She could, however, extricate herself from the situation by stating to them unequivocally that she considered the notice to quit to be valid irrespective of how it had been obtained. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The City argued the project was ineligible for the following reasons: (1) the project violated the City’s requirements that projects meet certain performance standards for off-site impacts and not exceed certain amount and intensity of use requirements; (2) the project was located within a three-block area designated as a City Landmark for the state-listed historical resource known as the West Berkeley Shellmound (“Shellmound”), and would have, thus,… [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
The City argued the project was ineligible for the following reasons: (1) the project violated the City’s requirements that projects meet certain performance standards for off-site impacts and not exceed certain amount and intensity of use requirements; (2) the project was located within a three-block area designated as a City Landmark for the state-listed historical resource known as the West Berkeley Shellmound (“Shellmound”), and would have, thus,… [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:13 am
Either 1 or 2 is a pre-requisite for 3.] [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
The second Ordinance seeks to amend the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act passed by Parliament earlier this year to carve out India’s 29th State- Telangana from the erstwhile undivided State of Andhra Pradesh.[2] This Ordinance makes certain amendments to the territories covered by the Khammam district under this State bifurcation law. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 9:07 pm
The logical result of this contention is that the property attempted to be disposed of in Article Tenth must descend by intestacy. [read post]
