Search for: "United States v. Chan" Results 61 - 80 of 132
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2009, 4:50 pm by Kevin Whitaker
In Does Technology Have to Trump Privacy Right,Nicole Black previously discussed the recently decided NY case of People v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 2:55 am by Etelka Bogardi (HK) and Stephanie Chan
For a detailed overview of Ruscoe v Cryptopia,please refer to our previous publication: Cryptocurrencies are property capable of being held on trust, New Zealand High Court holds The Hon Madam Justice Linda Chan noted that “the preponderance of jurisprudence recognises the proprietary nature of cryptocurrencies” and included case law on cryptocurrencies being considered as “property” (or similar definition) in various jurisdictions including England and… [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 12:10 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCRIMINAL PRACTICENo Reversible Error in Decision Not to Re-Sentence Pursuant to 'Crosby' After Remand United States, appellee v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
While the states were seen as “laboratories of democracy” by Justice Brandeis in New State Ice Company v Liebmann – in recent years states have become “laboratories of national partisan politics,” to adopt Jessica Bulman-Pozen’s gloss on Brandeis. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Bruen, and the tech and privacy implications of Dobbs v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 8:05 am
California) and publisher from "manufacturing, publishing, distributing, shipping, advertising, promoting, selling or otherwise disseminating any copy of 60 Years [the book] or any portion thereof, in or to the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 6:05 pm by Bridget Crawford
By Charles Fried | Volume 59 | Page 60 Transcendence: Conservative Wealth and Intergenerational Succession By Richard Delgado | Volume 59 | Page 44 Applying Rules of Discovery to Information Uncovered About Jurors By Thaddeus Hoffmeister | Volume 59 | Page 28 Footloose: How to Tame the Tucker Act Shuffle After United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:45 am by Margo Schlanger
The plenary-power doctrine was born in 1889, in Chae Chan Ping v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 12:02 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Adam Chan discussed how the decision in Torres v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
Paul Chan Mo-Po and another [2017] HKCA 149; CACV 252/2015). [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Government has published its much-awaited White Paper on “The Future of the Relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union”. [read post]