Search for: "United States v. Chandler" Results 21 - 40 of 197
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am by John Floyd
United States: An attorney with a conflict of interest cannot provide effective counsel. 1954 Chandler v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
Chandler requested that the settlement money be donate to a charity supporting the Ukraine in lieu of damages and legal fees. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am by Guest Author
Army of the indigenous tribes in the trans-Mississippi West, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the labor injunction, Plessy v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 11:45 am by Mukarrum Ahmed
 In Adams v Cape Industries plc [1990] Ch 433 the court rejected the single economic unit argument made in the DHN Ltd v Tower Hamlets LBC [1976] 1 WLR 852 decision, and also the approach that the court will pierce the corporate veil if it is necessary to achieve justice. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 10:00 am by Scott Hervey
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York recently addressed the issue of novelty as an element of an idea theft claim in Wexler v Hasbro. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 4:15 am by Matthew Schutte
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) transferred Ronald Chandler et. al. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 10:44 pm by Josh Blackman
First, Roberts wrote a solo dissent in United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am by INFORRM
These included Chandler v Thompson ((1811) 3 Camp 80, 170 ER 1312 [pdf]), Tapling v Jones (1865) 20 CBNS 166, 144 ER 1067 (HL)) and Turner v Spooner (1861) 30 LJ Ch 801 (Ch)), all of which discussed the opening of new windows overlooking neighbouring properties. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
County of Nassau, 86 NY2d 42)].This Doctrine, and a number of other significant public personnel law issues including the establishment of positions in the Classified Service by a political subdivision of the State, jurisdictional classification of positions in the Classified Service and the impact of a Taylor Law agreement in the event there is layoff of employees in the Labor Class, were considered by the Appellate Division in Chandler v Village of Spring Valley, 104… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
County of Nassau, 86 NY2d 42)].This Doctrine, and a number of other significant public personnel law issues including the establishment of positions in the Classified Service by a political subdivision of the State, jurisdictional classification of positions in the Classified Service and the impact of a Taylor Law agreement in the event there is layoff of employees in the Labor Class, were considered by the Appellate Division in Chandler v Village of Spring Valley, 104… [read post]