Search for: "United States v. Chaplin" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2016, 7:52 am by Joe Consumer
When I think about the 1920s, I think Charlie Chaplin, The Great Gatsby, Prohibition, silent movies, or this picture. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 5:05 am by Rosalind English
Eweida and Others v. the United Kingdom – read judgment The Strasbourg Court has today come up with something of a mixed message in relation to religion at work. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:40 pm by Adam Wagner
We posted: It is unsurprising, therefore, that more questions are being asked as to whether our judges are properly qualified to understand and rule on such controversial areas, even to the extent of looking more closely at their religious beliefs; something which is common in relation to the United States Supreme Court but until now has been unusual in the UK. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 12:19 am by 1 Crown Office Row
It referred to Strasbourg case law, cited in Ladele suggesting that Article 9 “primarily protects the sphere of personal beliefs and religious creeds and does not always guarantee the right to behave in the public sphere in a way which is dictated by such a belief”: C v United Kingdom App 10358/83. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 2:25 pm by Sam Murrant
Chaplin were both restricted from wearing crucifix necklaces by their employers; Ms. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 6:00 am by Matthew Salzwedel
For example, an en dash — not a hyphen — is needed in this pinpoint case citation: Unites States v. [read post]