Search for: "United States v. City of Detroit" Results 181 - 200 of 213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Shaft, Implementing the settlement of State of North Dakota v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Evan Caminker
” First, the court found the first part of the test satisfied because “state-provided education is ubiquitous throughout all but the earlier days of the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am by Dave Maass
Then they were standing at the door to the police investigative analysis unit. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:47 pm by Gareth
In this Circuit, courts traditionally consider …. the [nine] Grinnell factors [City of Detroit v. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 5:46 am
ESTTo be televised by ESPNGrand Valley State Lakers v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 8:10 pm
Metcalf    Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 08a0552n.06 Hussein Dia v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
Shusta, the court stated that even participants in an informal “kick the can” game owed no additional duty to each other than to refrain from intentional or willful and wanton misconduct. [19]             Some courts have broadened the scope of liability for sports participants by imposing a duty of care for unforeseeable risks which players would clearly not endorse… [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 26, 2010 Rhode Island Airport Corporation and its demolition contractors, O.R. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 6:00 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Finally, no project sponsor or lender reacts well to legal uncertainty, and at present, there is likely no other jurisdiction in the United States or its territories with more legal uncertainty than Puerto Rico. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
City of Memphis, No. 08-744T VIISee issue description at Public Citizen:Ø SCOTUS docket hereBaxter v. [read post]