Search for: "United States v. City of Detroit"
Results 181 - 200
of 214
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
I well remember one of my earliest assignments on the legal staff of the United Auto Workers in Detroit in the early ‘60s. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am
Shaft, Implementing the settlement of State of North Dakota v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm
United States, 121 F. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
Detroit Board of Education, and then again in Chicago Teachers Union v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
” First, the court found the first part of the test satisfied because “state-provided education is ubiquitous throughout all but the earlier days of the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
Plunges nationwide in real estate values in cities like Detroit and Las Vegas attest to this fact. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
Then they were standing at the door to the police investigative analysis unit. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:47 pm
In this Circuit, courts traditionally consider …. the [nine] Grinnell factors [City of Detroit v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
City of Wichita, No. 07-3155 (10th Cir. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 5:46 am
ESTTo be televised by ESPNGrand Valley State Lakers v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 8:10 pm
Metcalf Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 08a0552n.06 Hussein Dia v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
” State ex reI. 2 Dunlap v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 3:33 pm
Michigan Asphalt Paving: The United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
Shusta, the court stated that even participants in an informal “kick the can” game owed no additional duty to each other than to refrain from intentional or willful and wanton misconduct. [19] Some courts have broadened the scope of liability for sports participants by imposing a duty of care for unforeseeable risks which players would clearly not endorse… [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:31 pm
Detroit Board of Education, a 1977 precedent. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
– United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 26, 2010 Rhode Island Airport Corporation and its demolition contractors, O.R. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
Finally, no project sponsor or lender reacts well to legal uncertainty, and at present, there is likely no other jurisdiction in the United States or its territories with more legal uncertainty than Puerto Rico. [read post]
