Search for: "United States v. City of Detroit" Results 61 - 80 of 214
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2015, 8:57 am by WIMS
Grocery Manufacturers Association, et al v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:52 am by WIMS
United States Army Corps of Engineers - 3/23/15. [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:10 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Resource Investments v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 1:48 am
DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKElection Law 'Motor Voter' Law Breached by Failure to Name SUNY, CUNY Offices as Registration Agencies United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:39 pm
§ 227 Unsolicited Advertisement     Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:07 am by stu@crimapp.com
In 1992, the Michigan Court of Appeals reaffirmed this principle in Tax Payers United v Detroit. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Court said that §80 of the Civil Service Law "reflects a legislative imperative" that the City was powerless to bargain away.As the Court of Appeals said in County of Chautauqua v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Commissioner of Social Security&nbsp; &nbsp; Eastern District of Michigan at Bay City 08a0312p.06 2008/08/22 Phelps-Roper v. [read post]