Search for: "United States v. City of Detroit" Results 61 - 80 of 215
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
See also Comm’rs of Parks & Boulevards of City of Detroit v Moesta, 91 Mich 149, 152-53; 51 NW 903 (1892); In re Edward J. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 3:02 am by Jeffrey Shulman
Does the United States Constitution guarantee a right to a minimally adequate education? [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 11:38 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
One important Kennedy opinion pointing in the other direction was United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 5:25 am by Bobby Chen
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, addressed states’ authority to regulate LGBT issues; his opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:38 am by Anthony Gaughan
First and foremost, sports gambling is about to expand in the United States to an unprecedented extent. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 8:34 pm by Anthony Gaughan
NFL, the Fourth Circuit defined the relevant market as the United States as a whole, and it noted that the NFL only had a presence in 14 of the 30 largest markets in the country. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:29 am by Scott Bomboy
Then on Tuesday, February 27, the Court gets another big case, United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Zuri Blackmon
I said their commercials usually misrepresent the present state of tax collection, with remarks like “The IRS is coming down harder than before. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
 Prior to April 2014, Flint purchased treated water from the City of Detroit and thereafter, the city began using the Flint River as its water source. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 6:00 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Finally, no project sponsor or lender reacts well to legal uncertainty, and at present, there is likely no other jurisdiction in the United States or its territories with more legal uncertainty than Puerto Rico. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Brad Miller
State legislatures have discretion to set tax and spending priorities, the Supreme Court said in 1977 in United States Trust Co. v. [read post]