Search for: "United States v. City of Detroit" Results 121 - 140 of 215
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2013, 4:49 am by Steven Gursten
It’s caused the increase that everyone, including State Farm, has  seen in first-party No Fault claims on smaller injury cases in cities like Detroit. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 6:53 am by Joy Waltemath
The ruling came in response to a challenge against the City of Detroit’s bankruptcy filing last Thursday. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 2:38 pm by Marty Lederman
’” Then, relying upon the Supreme Court’s brand-new decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 1:00 pm by Eugene Volokh
” Among other things, the Salt Lake City billboard is part of a national campaign that seeks to remove any social stigma for those who do not believe in a deity, according to Fred Edwords, director of the United Coalition of Reason.... [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Shaft, Implementing the settlement of State of North Dakota v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Anderson
“The NAACP sent him to Detroit” in 1943, Kennedy noted, after the infamous race riot in the city. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:05 pm by Tony Mauro
The protests marked the two-year anniversary Saturday of the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Milwaukeeans had to wait until December 12 to learn that the United States Supreme Court had denied the state’s petition for certiorari. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:26 am by Steven M. Gursten
HB 4936 returns us to the problems No-Fault fixed nearly 40 years ago, and will be particularly devastating for injury victims in cities like Detroit and Pontiac “Those who choose to ignore history doom the rest of us by repeating it. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
On 15 July 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the use of full-body scanners to screen air travellers in the case of Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), et al. v United States Department of Homeland Security, et al. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:07 am by stu@crimapp.com
In 1992, the Michigan Court of Appeals reaffirmed this principle in Tax Payers United v Detroit. [read post]