Search for: "United States v. Clark" Results 21 - 40 of 1,600
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2012, 3:00 am by Karen Tani
Clark’s groundbreaking studies on race and child development helped end segregation in the United States. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
In 1995, the United States launched the first NAFTA trade challenge.[9] It was the first and only NAFTA Chapter 20 Canada-U.S. dispute as the agreement’s state-to-state provisions fell into disuse. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 6:54 pm by Mary Whisner
Times, Jan. 10, 2011.For a very interesting account of the representation of Kaczynski, see Michael Mello, United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:13 pm
Proc., § 410.10) authorizes California courts to exercise jurisdiction on any basis not inconsistent with the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of California. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:07 pm by Kali Borkoski
The transcript in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 5:34 am by Howard Bashman
United States may be so intellectually stimulating that nobody seems to have noticed that the case has been fundamentally misframed”: Law professor Conor Clarke has this essay online at The Atlantic. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm by Tracey Roberts
Roberts (Cumberland; Google Scholar) reviews new works by Conor Clarke (Washington University; Google Scholar), Moore: The Overlooked Excise Power, 181 Tax Notes Fed. 1759 (Dec. 4, 2023) and Reuven Avi-Yonah (Michigan; Google Scholar), Effects from Moore: Does the Corporate Tax Require Realization, 182 Tax Notes Fed.... [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 10:51 pm by Michael DelSignore
In a unanimous decision reached by differing concurring opinions, the Supreme Court of the United States finally resolved the question left open by Crawford asking whether statements made to persons other than law enforcement trigger the Confrontation Clause. [read post]