Search for: "United States v. Classic" Results 201 - 220 of 1,741
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Gilead does not include the entirety of what used to be the United States, but that aspect of the story is not pertinent to this discussion. [read post]
4 May 2022, 7:29 am by jonathanturley
” When asked about that statement in the context of Roe, Gorsuch responded: “Senator, as the book explains, the Supreme Court of the United States has held in Roe v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" No, said the California Supreme Court: [W]e are not persuaded that imposing a duty on landlords to withhold rental units from those they believe to be gang members is a fair or workable solution to [the] problem [of gang violence], or one consistent with our state's public policy as a whole. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm by Lee Reiners
The Executive Order on digital assets offers six objectives that serve as a natural starting point: protect consumers, investors, and businesses; protect United States and global financial stability and mitigate systemic risk; mitigate the illicit finance and national security risks; reinforce United States leadership in the global financial system and in technological and economic competitiveness; promote access to safe and affordable financial services; and… [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 6:15 am by Don Asher
  They will visit Monaco, Sweden, and the United Kingdom not only to strengthen current economic ties but to encourage even more overseas industrial investment in the Hoosier State. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm by Carl Custer
The classic example is Blankenship (1993). [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 5:36 pm
I am delighted to share the video recording of the  event recently sponsored by the Penn State Law Federalist Society: "Natural Law and the US Constitutional Order" which was held at Penn State law 12 April 2022. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Oklahoma state law provides that “if a vacancy or irrevocable resignation occurs in the office of a member of the United States Senate from Oklahoma” the state must hold a special election to fill the empty or to-be-empty seat. [read post]