Search for: "United States v. Classic"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,737
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2023, 1:49 pm
Here's one thing I know for sure: the United States has the power to -- and actively does -- imposes taxes on residents regardless of where they're located and regardless of whether that income is earned in other countries. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 11:37 am
Petrella v. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
Claire Poppelwell-Scevak, Strasbourg Observers: ‘Until Social Norms Say I Do’: How the Grand Chamber Taketh and Giveth Away in Fedotova and Others v Russia: on the recent case in which the GC ECtHR held that there is a positive obligation under Article 8 for member states to afford some sort of legal recognition and protection to same-sex couples. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:28 am
United States, 461 U.S. 574, 604 n.30 (1983); McGowan v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:44 pm
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) in favor of treating “Bigness” as an independent antitrust harm. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:44 pm
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) in favor of treating “Bigness” as an independent antitrust harm. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:27 am
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:39 am
Some more from Justice Brennan in Garrison v. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 2:40 pm
This is a classic taking for which Person A is clearly entitled to be compensated. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 7:48 am
Department of Veterans’ Affairs and United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:47 am
For example, the United States’s general copyright duration is 70 years after the death of the author, and Mexico’s duration is 100 years after the death of the author. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
Thus, while nuanced variations of the argument exist, they generally share a common understanding that classic neutrality rules do not apply to State aid and assistance provided to a victim-State such as Ukraine. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 5:31 am
In the United States, the fair use doctrine allows the exploitation of a copyrighted work “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 9:25 am
United States, 345 U.S. 594, 625 (1953) and see F.T.C. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 6:00 am
Rawls thought that the Supreme Court's deliberations and opinions about the meaning of the United States Constitution exemplified the idea of public reason.Historical Perspective Where does the idea of public reason come from? [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 7:56 pm
United States and Shoop v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
In Taamneh v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) in favor of treating “Bigness” as an independent antitrust harm. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 5:45 pm
Even the United States Secretary of State implied as much on his latest visit, expressing concern about the “core importance of democratic principles and institutions. [read post]
