Search for: "United States v. Classic" Results 161 - 180 of 1,741
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2022, 8:43 am by Michael Caruso
Perhaps The Judicial Conference of the United States should do the same for judges. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
From that it follows that it is impermissible to base state policies on claimsabout the divine will. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts tried (obviously unsuccessfully) to avoid the complete overturning of Roe v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:33 am by Guest Blogger
An example is a useful discussion between Jamie McGowanand Michael Foranabout how exactly judicial review of rights works on classical premises. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Stephen M. Bainbridge
”[15] The purpose of a restatement is to clarify “the underlying principles of the common law” that have “become obscured by the ever-growing mass of decisions in the many different jurisdictions, state and federal, within the United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
Kansas (1887) and was the lone dissenter in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 10:07 am by Josh Blackman
See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 24 (Brief for United States); see also Brief for Equal Protection Constitutional Law Scholars as Amici Curiae. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 4:47 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: The United States Supreme Court recently issued a fractured decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
’”  In their place, we are offered something “new [sic[ and better—a common good constitutionalism grounded in the classical tradition. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:17 am by IntLawGrrls
The first one is quite a classic one; it was the case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am by admin
For example, he raises and explains the problem encountered for causal inference by small relative risks: “Small relative risks of the order of 2:1 or even less are what are likely to be observed, like the risk now recorded for childhood leukemia and exposure to magnetic fields of 0.4 µT or more (Ahlbom et al. 2000) that are seldom encountered in the United Kingdom. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 10:50 am
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
It is the victory of their ideas that killed the doctrinal legal treatise as a respectable form of scholarship in the United States. [read post]