Search for: "United States v. Clinton" Results 201 - 220 of 1,146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2010, 6:50 am by Erin Miller
The biggest news out of the Court yesterday was the opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:24 am by Tejinder Singh
Today in the Community we are discussing United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Probably Russia or China would be delighted to loan President Trump a few billion, but it might not be so good for the United States. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 7:21 am by Conor McEvily
  For this blog’s Academic round-up, Amanda Frost examines some of the academic commentary on the Fourth Amendment’s applicability to GPS surveillance, an issue the Court will take up in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 2:38 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The defendants allegedly conducted what they called “information warfare against the United States,” with the stated goal of “spread[ing] distrust towards the candidates and the political system in general…” U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 2:35 am by Jane Seu
Campaign Finance Jeff Merkley and Bernie Sanders both called for the Supreme Court’s controversial case, Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 11:10 am
Third Circuit decision addresses free speech and termination for just cause issuesRita Miller v Clinton County [Pennsylvania], USCA, 3rd Circuit, Docket # 07-2105In this case, the Circuit Court of Appeals sets out the guidelines followed by courts in resolving claims by public officers and employees that their employer has violated their First Amendment right to free speech and the impact of the terms of a collective bargaining agreement on judicial control over the hiring,… [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 6:58 am by Bruce Zagaris
On July 13, 2018,  Deputy Attorney of the United States announced that a grand jury in the U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 6:58 am by Bruce Zagaris
On July 13, 2018,  Deputy Attorney of the United States announced that a grand jury in the U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:12 am by Amy Howe
United States and explains that, “[a]s a statutory interpretation case,” it “is especially notable in two ways: for using ordinary principles of statutory interpretation in a treaty implementation case and for the lack of interpretive deference afforded the Executive Branch. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 5:15 pm by David Oscar Markus
United States, 447 U.S. 649 (1980); United States v. [read post]