Search for: "United States v. Clinton"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2013, 8:12 am
Harris mandates that a wrong be righted, Garden State Equality v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 5:56 am
Here's the ending of Justice Kennedy's opinion for the Court in Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Mar 2025, 3:56 pm
It will join another magazine ban case in Ocean State Tactical v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm
Roberts would also represent a number of states in the Microsoft antitrust case, United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 9:48 am
Sanford secured the largest employment verdict in United States history. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Reforming the Supreme Court of the United States, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:33 am
Today in the Community we are discussing Arizona v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:24 am
United States, issued this morning.Where is the line between official and unofficial in the charges against Trump? [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:56 am
Clinton, Secretary of State; U.S. (2012); United States Supreme Court, March 21, 2012 [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 11:04 am
"Citizen's United v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:41 am
In Nicaragua v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 10:26 am
Cain United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 9:56 am
Arora v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 6:34 pm
You might have thought the case, United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 5:23 am
What is critical is that Judge Cannon crossed way over the line when she refused to follow the decision of the United States Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 4:57 am
State v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:57 pm
Sherley v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
And, in fact, such a challenge did occur (and the LIVA was struck down—wrongly, to my mind) in Clinton v. [read post]
