Search for: "United States v. Clinton"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm
United States, which begins: The owners of a Sudanese pharmaceutical plant sued the United States for unjustifiably destroying the plant, failing to compensate them for its destruction, and defaming them by asserting they had ties to Osama bin Laden. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 3:23 pm
"We continue to assume that the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires a speedy sentencing and find that the sentencing delay in this case violated [Clinton H.] [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 4:56 pm
Nevertheless, rulemaking without prior comment has increased across a wide range of agencies, a trend that may be strong enough to persist despite the Supreme Court's 2001 decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 5:24 am
Here are the official positions of each party:The Republicans aver that the Democrats, sensing weakness, refused to approve a reasonable spending bill until the Republicans and Trump agreed to 1) Let all Mexicans who have criminal records into the United States with fast access to becoming citizens. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 10:28 am
The case was distributed on January 30 for a February 15 conference, and thereafter the Solicitor General was invited to present the views of the United States, which he has not yet done. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 2:52 am
Clinton, 566 U. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:37 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 6:28 am
In commemoration of the 1969 riots at the Stonewall Inn in New York City, June is Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Pride Month in the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 6:01 pm
United States (the anti-commandeering principle)Clinton v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 9:00 pm
Because he has abdicated such prosecution decisions to Attorney General Holder and United States Attorneys (which is doubtful)? [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 4:28 am
Although a number of collective bargaining agreements provide for a shorter “statutes of limitations” for filing disciplinary charges against an individual in a collective bargaining unit, it is unlikely that setting a greater statute of limitations for employees in a collective bargaining unit would survive judicial review for the reason set out by the Appellate Division in City of Plattsburgh v Local 788, 108 AD2d 1045 -- a collective bargaining agreement may… [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 6:09 am
Watson briefed Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
The case Goodridge v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 9:06 am
Supreme Court case of Troxel v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 4:43 pm
Clinton, 48 M.J. 84 (C.A.A.F. 1998), and United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:32 am
” The cert. petitions in that case, United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 5:46 pm
Google v China: Do we know corporate social responsibility when we see it? [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
As the unanimous Court said in the 1974 Watergate Case, United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 7:04 pm
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 8:04 am
United States v. [read post]