Search for: "United States v. Clinton" Results 141 - 160 of 1,157
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2022, 8:25 pm by Josh Blackman
[That statute disqualifies a person from "holding any office under the United States. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
From that it follows that it is impermissible to base state policies on claimsabout the divine will. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 12:33 pm by Josh Blackman
This drawing is from oral arguments in Printz v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 3:17 pm by CAFE
Code §192 - Refusal of witness to testify or produce papersUnited States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 3:17 pm by CAFE
Code §192 - Refusal of witness to testify or produce papersUnited States v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 8:31 am by jonathanturley
Support for this claim could be based on a  2019 study in the Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery that found that “Mass-shooting related homicides in the United States were reduced during the years of the federal assault weapons ban of 1994 to 2004”. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:06 am by Chile Eboe-Osuji
When German ultra-nationalists were peddling under the Nazi swastika ugly rhetoric similar to what is now making the rounds in the United States as “replacement theory,” Germany’s mainstream society did not take them seriously. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Bankruptcy judges are appointed by majority vote of the judges within a United States Court of Appeals Circuit. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable on Reforming the Supreme Court of the United States, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]