Search for: "United States v. Cohan"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2020, 12:47 am
Justice Doris Ling-Cohan of the New York State Supreme Court found that U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:28 am
In 2006, in the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York, Banushi! [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 11:16 am
United States Issue: Whether a presumption of prejudice for improper jury contact should apply to a throat-slitting gesture made by the defendant’s grandfather to members of the jury. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm
The defamation claim in Cohan v Darr (Kokopelli Hair Salon and Lounge Gallergy) SC-2021-004721 was dismissed and counterclaim refused. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 8:03 am
United States, 570 F.3d 672 (5th Cir. 2009)(stating that estimates are permissible under the Cohan Rule) ; but see Shami v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:42 am
[29] Although the “longstanding” [30] rule developed in Cohan v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
Lebowitz The author is a Queens County Supreme Court justice. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OCA Not Proper Party In Judges' Pay Suit September 14, 2007 To the Editor, In the Law Journal on Sept. 11, page 2 (see below), the attorney for the judges who are petitioners in Maron v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 9:15 am
In Cohan v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:42 am
Cohan v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:56 pm
Magistrates in the Tang Dynasty in early China were also eager to avoid the formal legal system and so encouraged parties to resolve disputes amicably between themselves.[9] In contrast, the United States’ patent law can be seen in the case of Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:57 pm
It was Corzine's stated goal to transform MF Global from a commodity broker into an investment bank with a large proprietary trading operation similar to the one Corzine ran at Goldman in the 1990s. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:26 am
Today the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court just decided, in Holmes v. [read post]
