Search for: "United States v. Commodities Trading Corp" Results 1 - 20 of 55
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2013, 6:54 am by Keith Paul Bishop
 The Court of Appeal concluded that these contracts were not securities under either the investment contract test enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in S.E.C. v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 8:03 am
Board of Trade, 06-1265), on the power of states to tax the interest on other states' municipal bonds (Kentucky Department of Revenue v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 12:01 am by Russell Beck
  Federal (Colorado):  On December 2, 2016, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado issued an injunction in Engility Corp. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 9:00 pm by The JAG HUNTER
., Captain, Medical Corps, United States Navy THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON The President of the United States takes pleasure in presenting the PRESIDENTIAL UNIT CITATION to the UNITED STATES SHIP COLE for service as set forth in the following CITATION: “For outstanding performance as guide for the first wave of landing boats in the attack on Safi, French Morocco, November 8, 1942. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm by The JAG HUNTER
., Captain, Medical Corps, United States Navy THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON The President of the United States takes pleasure in presenting the PRESIDENTIAL UNIT CITATION to the UNITED STATES SHIP COLE for service as set forth in the following CITATION: “For outstanding performance as guide for the first wave of landing boats in the attack on Safi, French Morocco, November 8, 1942. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:00 pm by The JAG HUNTER
., Captain, Medical Corps, United States Navy THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON The President of the United States takes pleasure in presenting the PRESIDENTIAL UNIT CITATION to the UNITED STATES SHIP COLE for service as set forth in the following CITATION: “For outstanding performance as guide for the first wave of landing boats in the attack on Safi, French Morocco, November 8, 1942. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am by Dennis Crouch
Promega Corporation, No. 14-1538 (Whether the Federal Circuit erred in holding that supplying a single, commodity component of a multi-component invention from the United States is an infringing act under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 9:24 am by Andrew Cross
However, the market for those products remains small and outside of the United States. [read post]