Search for: "United States v. Commodities Trading Corp" Results 1 - 20 of 91
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Indeed, as one federal court recently stated, “the ‘crypto’ nomenclature may be of recent vintage, but the challenged transactions fall comfortably within the framework that courts have used to identify securities for nearly eighty years. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
”[2]  In that same policy, the Commission articulated its belief “that a refusal to admit the allegations is equivalent to a denial, unless the defendant or respondent states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am by Bernard Bell
Weber Aircraft Corp., 465 U.S. 792, 802 (1984); Federal Open Market Committee of Federal Reserve System v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 5:01 am by Robert Liles
Simply stated, Civil Investigative Demands used in False Claims Act investigations are essentially subpoenas authorized under 31 U.S. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Gary Gensler
”[3] He further stated, “Congress’ purpose in enacting the securities laws was to regulate investments, in whatever form they are made and by whatever name they are called. [read post]
It is still unclear whether the investigation will result in an enforcement action.[15] Other Financial Regulatory Agencies Beyond the SEC, other financial regulatory agencies have clearly signaled to the market that they intend to step up ESG regulation and enforcement: Approximately two weeks after the SEC announced its creation of the Climate and ESG Task force, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) established its own Climate Risk Unit “to… [read post]
Instead, we write to express our unanimous view the SEC has clear statutory authority to mandate additional climate-related disclosures for publicly traded companies. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 8:16 am by Cinthia Macie
”  The FTC’s “Made in USA” labeling rule will prohibit marketers from using that designation unless “1) final assembly or processing of the product occurs in the United States; 2) all significant processing that goes into the product occurs in the United States; and 3) all or virtually all ingredients or components of the product are made and sourced in the United States. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 3:21 pm by Patricia Hughes
The UFCW (and individual complainants) brought a complaint against MedReleaf of an unfair labour practice in violation of the AEPA that the AFRAAT dismissed in United Food and Commercial Workers International Union v MedReleaf Corp. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 2:32 pm by Patricia Hughes
The Tribunal dismissed these complaints in United Food and Commercial Workers International Union v MedReleaf Corp., a decision the Divisional Court upheld in Aurora. [read post]