Search for: "United States v. Comstock" Results 181 - 200 of 299
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2010, 1:07 pm by Ilya Somin
Among other things, it explains why the mandate runs afoul of the five part test established in the Supreme Court’s most recent Necessary and Proper Clause decision, United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 1:25 pm by WIMS
Circuit, Case No. 11-1302, EME Homer City Generation, L.P v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am by John Mikhail
It is the only part of the Necessary and Proper Clause quoted by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 1:02 pm by WIMS
" There were no cosponsors to the bill which was referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Chaired by Representative Henry Waxman (D-CA).On April 2, 2007, the United States Supreme Court, in Massachusetts v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
  Thankfully, no Justice wrote to give any credence at all to the absurd arguments that the President isn’t an “officer of the United States” or that the presidency isn’t an office “under the United States. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 8:27 am by Savanna Nolan
 In the United States we value the freedom of speech very highly, particularly because the Founding Fathers were wary of British prior restraint laws and their effect on a democratic society. [read post]
20 May 2010, 5:00 am by zshapiro
§4248 in United States v, Comstock on the basis that the Constitution does not grant the Federal government authority to institutionalize them beyond their maximum prison commitment. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:44 am by WIMS
<> CERCLA Contribution; The Confusion Continues - In the words of Justice Thomas in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:51 am by WIMS
<> EPA Awarding Close to $13 Million to Assist Small Drinking Water and Wastewater Systems Across the United States - U.S. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 6:01 am
Buono, United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 8:13 am
United States in 2006, greatly reduced the scope of the CWA, undermining decades of clean water protections. [read post]