Search for: "United States v. Comstock" Results 81 - 100 of 299
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
The United States also argues that the mandate is necessary and proper to carry out the law's insurance reforms. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm by WIMS
United States Environmental Protection Agency. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 1:16 pm by WIMS
 Commerce's finding of "critical circumstances" means that if the agency imposes preliminary countervailing duties on March 2, the duties will apply to all imports of cells and modules from Chinese exporters that were brought into the United States starting December 3, 2011. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 1:10 pm by WIMS
      However, in the case of Sierra Club v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:11 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) At least as of this evening, with a search from the Washington, DC area (a necessary caveat):united states v. lopez united states v. carroll towing co. united states v. morrison united states v. jones united states v. comstock united states v. virginia united states v. booker united… [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:22 pm by WIMS
Oct 3: National Mining Association (NMA) President and CEO Hal Quinn announced that the association was filing a petition in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for reconsideration and stay and petition for review of U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:17 pm by WIMS
" OIG indicates that EPA stated that its response to the final report will address the recommendations. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am by John Mikhail
It is the only part of the Necessary and Proper Clause quoted by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 6:00 am by Kedar
Update: As correctly noted by Mike Sachs, Chief Justice Roberts’ most significant betrayal to date was in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 12:00 am by Ilya Somin
United States, the Court has held that these are two separate requirements that must both be met. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:25 pm by Orin Kerr
Justices Breyer and Ginsburg are pretty obvious votes for the mandate, as they dissented in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 6:54 am by Neil Siegel, guest-blogging
Maryland and recently reaffirmed by a majority of Justices in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:38 am by Steven Schwinn - Guest
  In the Court’s most recent foray, in United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:56 pm by Laurence Tribe
  In the landmark case of Wickard v. [read post]