Search for: "United States v. Comstock"
Results 81 - 100
of 294
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2012, 1:16 pm
Commerce's finding of "critical circumstances" means that if the agency imposes preliminary countervailing duties on March 2, the duties will apply to all imports of cells and modules from Chinese exporters that were brought into the United States starting December 3, 2011. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 1:10 pm
However, in the case of Sierra Club v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:11 pm
(Orin Kerr) At least as of this evening, with a search from the Washington, DC area (a necessary caveat):united states v. lopez united states v. carroll towing co. united states v. morrison united states v. jones united states v. comstock united states v. virginia united states v. booker united… [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:22 pm
Oct 3: National Mining Association (NMA) President and CEO Hal Quinn announced that the association was filing a petition in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for reconsideration and stay and petition for review of U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:17 pm
" OIG indicates that EPA stated that its response to the final report will address the recommendations. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:52 pm
Maryland to United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am
It is the only part of the Necessary and Proper Clause quoted by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
Update: As correctly noted by Mike Sachs, Chief Justice Roberts’ most significant betrayal to date was in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 12:00 am
United States, the Court has held that these are two separate requirements that must both be met. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:41 am
Comstock), or the Copyright Clause (Eldred v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 4:25 pm
Justices Breyer and Ginsburg are pretty obvious votes for the mandate, as they dissented in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 6:54 am
Maryland and recently reaffirmed by a majority of Justices in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:38 am
In the Court’s most recent foray, in United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:56 pm
In the landmark case of Wickard v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:28 pm
United States (1992), and United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 7:37 am
The “tangible link to commerce … based on empirical demonstration” that Justice Kennedy identified as necessary under the Commerce Clause two Terms ago in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm
State of play When all this began in March 2010 – the same day President Obama signed the legislation, both Virginia and the Florida-led multi-state coalition filed complaints in federal court – mainstream pundits dismissed the challenges as legally frivolous, politically motivated sour grapes. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 1:04 pm
It is well documented that, under existing standards and regulations, air quality in the United States has improved considerably and will continue to do so," the members wrote. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 9:01 pm
So consider last year's decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:24 pm
United States (547 U.S. 715 (2006)) (Rapanos)). [read post]
