Search for: "United States v. Comstock"
Results 161 - 180
of 292
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2014, 8:22 am
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as unsafe for <> BTLaw Alert: EPA Proposes Rulemaking: Revising the Regulatory Definition of "Waters of the United States" - The 370-page proposal should be published in the Federal Register soon, starting a 90-day comment period <> Supreme Court to Decide Whether CERCLA Statute Can Revive Otherwise Time-Barred Toxic Tort Suit - The Supreme Court will hear oral argument in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 8:06 am
<> United States joins push for transparency in Extractive Industries - The United States is now preparing to participate in the EITI, Clare Short and panelists representing implementing countries, mining companies, and civil society will discuss this and other high profile changes to the transparency regime. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 8:30 am
Comstock. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 8:29 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:04 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES William E. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:46 am
Supreme Court offered in a majority opinion just a few months ago in United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:14 pm
In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is 'no.' [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:45 pm
The case followed another related decision in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:52 pm
Maryland to United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:28 pm
United States (1992), and United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 8:26 am
United States, in which a splintered Court addressed emergency obstetric litigation under federal and state law. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 9:30 am
Finally, Above the Law has released its latest predictions for four pending cases, Quon, Christian Legal Society, McDonald, and Comstock, based on the outcome of Citizens United. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 1:30 pm
Chicago, which considers whether the 2nd amendment should be incorporated to the states United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:49 am
United States Issue: Does United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:07 pm
Among other things, it explains why the mandate runs afoul of the five part test established in the Supreme Court’s most recent Necessary and Proper Clause decision, United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:23 am
Lopez, and U.S. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 1:25 pm
Circuit, Case No. 11-1302, EME Homer City Generation, L.P v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am
It is the only part of the Necessary and Proper Clause quoted by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 1:02 pm
" There were no cosponsors to the bill which was referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Chaired by Representative Henry Waxman (D-CA).On April 2, 2007, the United States Supreme Court, in Massachusetts v. [read post]
