Search for: "United States v. Congress Construction Co."
Results 101 - 120
of 776
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
On July 20, the Ninth Circuit declined to rehear en banc Fazaga v. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 12:01 am
(Detroit Publishing Co., Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division) Meanwhile, “Jim Crow” laws taking rights away from blacks were enacted in one state of the South after another. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:34 am
United States, ___ U.S. ___, 134 S. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:28 am
United States, 2020 WL 398625 (D.C. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 2:09 pm
In No. 08-905, Merck & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Those principles, and the rule of law construct it embodies, find expression in the United States in the jurisprudence of fundamental rights. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 7:43 am
In Texas v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 9:01 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit rejected the challenge, holding that Congress did not clearly resolve what “reasonable period of time” meant, and that in light of this textual uncertainty, the FCC’s interpretation of that term was entitled to deference under the famous 1984 administrative law case of Chevron v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 6:57 am
Rather, we are led to our conclusion principally by an expansive gloss on the preemptive scope of the AEA first set forth in Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:57 am
(A “United States work” is a work first published in the United States, or simultaneously published in the United States and any foreign country; or an unpublished work (or a work first published in a nation with whom the United States does not have a copyright treaty) for which all authors are citizens of or domiciled in the United States. 17 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm
Region, 558 U.S. 67, 81 (2009) (quoting United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 7:27 am
"); United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm
United States, 522 F.3d 937, 940 (9th Cir. 2008); see United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 9:30 pm
Swift & Co. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:30 am
Bulova Watch Co. that the Lanham Act covered the conduct of a United States citizen who sold in Mexico luxury watches falsely stamped with a U.S. trademark. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 10:33 am
United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 10:46 am
ShareOn Wednesday, the justices will hear argument in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
”[11] So stated, this approach simply announced a rule of statutory construction that did not seem particularly frightening. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:58 pm
§ 1182(f), authorizing the president to bar entry of foreign nationals “detrimental to the interests of the United States”—the same provision that Trump used for his travel ban, which the Supreme Court upheld in Trump v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 2:29 am
United States, 541 U.S. 176, 183 (2004). [read post]
