Search for: "United States v. Congress Construction Co." Results 141 - 160 of 774
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2015, 6:53 am by Peter Margulies
 However Tim’s suggestion that Congress drop the “conduct of the foreign affairs of the United States” prong of the FISA Amendments Act (FAA) doesn’t reckon with that proposed reform’s costs. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:19 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
That was a question recently considered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:11 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
That was a question recently considered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 6:04 am by Peter Margulies
That provision authorizes the president to impose restrictions on foreign nationals entering the United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:37 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Transfers to the United States will be illegal, as will construction of facilities in the United States to house detainees. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
            Despite the asymmetry between the two books, two concerns unite them that deserve critical treatment. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 2:55 pm by Ilya Somin
New Jersey features a clash between the power of eminent domain and state sovereign immunity. ] A number of people have asked me what I think about PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 11:50 am by Scott R. Anderson, Yishai Schwartz
The United States described the evolution of its position on Jerusalem from this point forward in its 2014 merits brief in the matter of Zivotofsky v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:43 am by Ronald Mann
The Court returned to that topic Wednesday morning when it heard arguments in Atlantic Marine Construction Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, No. 15-446 (BRI construction in IPRs; institution decisions unreviewable) Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
Article III provides that federal courts may hear “cases” and “controversies,” including “all cases, in law and equity, arising under . . . the laws of the United States . . . . [read post]