Search for: "United States v. Consolidated Edison Co."
Results 1 - 20
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2012, 1:23 pm
Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 7:00 am
Per Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:28 pm
Unlike Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 11:52 am
Rev. 1891 was not her first commentary on Edison and the light bulb.For example, one has the 2010 post New light from an old source, which includes the text:Contrary to popular wisdom, however, Edison’s team was merely one of dozens that co-invented electric light bulb.Scientifically speaking, his team’s discoveries were neither the first, nor the most important.What Edison did better than all the other inventors took place not in the laboratory,… [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:22 am
Consolidated Edison of New York (“Con Edison”) agreed to settle claims brought by state and federal investigators regarding allegations of widespread sexual harassment and sex discrimination brought by female employees. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:28 am
Electric Light Co v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 5:42 am
Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa., 21 NY3d at 154, quoting Consolidated Edison, 98 NY2d 208, 222 [2002]; see United States Fid. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 11:43 am
In two cases, Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 10:55 am
Light Co. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 10:17 am
Edison Storage Battery Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 8:09 pm
Co., 306 AD2d 806, 807; Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. v United Coastal Ins. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 5:02 am
Co. v Pace Plumbing Corp., 298 AD2d 146, 147; Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. v United States Fid. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 3:44 am
United States, 459 F.3d 827, 832 (8th Cir.2006) and Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 12:30 pm
Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, 580 F.2d 1122, 1131 n.18 (2nd Cir. 1978) (Rule covers contractor records provided to Atomic Energy Commission); United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 9:30 am
The United States Supreme Court earlier in Cooper Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:03 am
That is, an accord and satisfaction requires a "dispute as to the amount due and knowing acceptance by the creditor of a lesser amount" (Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. v Jet Asphalt Corp., 132 AD2d 296, 303 [1987]; see Marine Midland Bank v Scallen, 161 AD2d 103, 105 [1990]). [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 1:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 6:38 pm
United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 1:26 am
The Consolidated Edison Corp. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 1:51 am
Consolidated Edison Co. of New York Inc. [read post]
