Search for: "United States v. Consumer Life Ins. Co" Results 21 - 40 of 75
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
Therefore, in interpreting and applying this Code section, the courts of this state may draw from the opinions ofthe United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 1:10 pm by S2KM Limited
United States, a 2016 case brought by an ELNY shortfall victim. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 1:10 pm by S2KM Limited
United States, a 2016 case brought by an ELNY shortfall victim. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 1692a(6).In Henson, the United States Supreme Court specified that it would only determine whether the defendant was a debt collector pursuant to the second definition of section 1692a(6), i.e., whether the "statutory language defining the term `debt collector' [] embrace[s] anyone who `regularly collects or attempts to collect . . . debts owed or due . . . another.'" 137 S. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:57 pm by Cicely Wilson
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., United States Supreme Court (1/13/15)Banking, Consumer Law, Real Estate & Property LawExactly three years after borrowing money to refinance their home mortgage, the Jesinoskis sent the lender a letter purporting to rescind the transaction. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Md. 2012) (same); New York State Pesticide Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]