Search for: "United States v. Container Corp." Results 401 - 420 of 2,082
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2017, 11:03 am by Ronald Mann
” In that case, the court discerned a grant of jurisdiction in a charter that authorized the Red Cross to “sue and be sued in courts of law and equity, State or Federal, within the jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 6:57 am by Thomas Heintzman
  Except for the City of Ottawa and one other respondent, the respondents were all non-Ontario parties and resided or carried on business in the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 7:14 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
  Except for the City of Ottawa and one other respondent, the respondents were all non-Ontario parties and resided or carried on business in the United States. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 11:49 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Damages were at issue in this installment of the CAFC review of the omeprazole litigation:Apotex Corp., Apotex Inc., and TorPharm Inc., (collectively,“Apotex”) appeal from a final judgment enteredagainst them by the United States District Court for theSouthern District of New York. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 2:51 am
 Indeed, as far as I am aware U.S. courts have only granted anti-suit injunctions in global FRAND-disputes on two occasions: Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 6:22 pm
On Wednesday, February 21, 2007, the Supreme Court will hear argument in No. 05-1056, Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
However, if the Kalin decision allows a lower court to use its discretion to accept a police officer's assertions of their training and experience and the other allegations contained in the complaint, without a description of the substance seized, and declare them to be legally sufficient in all cases, then Kalin, as well as Jahron S., is inconsistent with the court's obligation to protect the constitutional right to procedural due process discussed by the United… [read post]