Search for: "United States v. Container Corp."
Results 61 - 80
of 2,334
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2020, 2:25 pm
The 2007 Settlement contains a choice-of-law provision requiring that it “be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Illinois as to all matters of interpretation and remedy. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 3:59 am
(“”Sears”) (collectively “Defendants”) in the United States District Court for the Central District of California (styled Steve Chambers, Lynn Van Der Veer, David Brown, Bach-Tuyet Brown, Kevin O’Donnell, Joseph Cicchelli, Kurt Himler, Susan Milicia, Gary LeBlanc and James Cashman v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 9:52 am
Army Corps of Engineers finding that property contains “waters of the United States” is “final agency action” subject to judicial review. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:30 am
., United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 9:57 pm
Category: ITC By: Christian Hannon, Contributor TitleuPI Semiconductor Corp. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 1:28 am
ToxicCleanup_Army Corp Eng.jpg In prosecution for knowingly violating standards for handling asbestos-containing materials, evidence from ceiling material samples was relevant and admissible even though the samples had been collected over a year after the defendant's indictment and were taken from structures on which the defendant did not work; undisputed evidence that all building ceilings at the work site were made of the same materials allowed a reasonable… [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:09 pm
Ceridian Corp. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 11:45 am
Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:54 pm
The leading authority for this principle is the 1967 United States Supreme Court decision in Prima Paint Corp. v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 9:12 am
Established by the United States Supreme Court in Boyle v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 1:55 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:59 pm
Pa- tent No. 7,892,281 (“’281 patent”), appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California granting summary judgment to Edwards Lifesciences Corp., Edwards Lifesciences LLC, and Edwards Lifesciences (U.S.) [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 1:32 am
Gelfand v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 5:28 am
See, Bennett v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:48 am
On one hand, United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 4:10 am
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:36 pm
Smith v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 8:07 pm
In United States ex rel Hepburn v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 10:53 am
The question presented in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:23 am
The Tennessee Supreme Court has ruled that Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
