Search for: "United States v. Continental Can Co" Results 81 - 100 of 124
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Yet arguments of a conflict between copyright law and the First Amendment in the United States are relatively new — understanding why the two co-existed for nearly two centuries before these arguments began to appear should prove valuable to current scholarship. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am by Kevin LaCroix
However, last year, in an abrupt reversal, the United States Supreme Court dramatically limited the extraterritorial application of U.S. securities laws in Morrison v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:25 am by Kevin Russell
United States Army Corps of Engineers, 543 F.3d 586, 594 (9th Cir. 2008)). [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
In addition to being strong and thoughtful statements of United States policy, these two speeches provide the framework within which my observations here can be better understood. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
So far as enforcement is concerned, it can safely be said that a valid foreign nation decree that orders the payment of money will usually be enforced in the United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Copyright protection in the United States was first championed by a group of authors, including Noah Webster and Joel Barlow.10 In response, a committee in the Continental Congress — consisting of James Madison, Hugh Williamson, and Ralph Izard — drafted a resolution that recommended the states pass their own copyright laws.11 Twelve of the thirteen states had passed such legislation by 1786. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
However, if you might use the textbook next semester, and would like to see some chapters, just contact any of the co-authors, and we can mail them to you.The 11 chapters of the printed textbook proceed chronologically, from ancient Rome, Greece, and China, all the way to the post–Heller cases. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm by Christa Culver
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLPDocket: 10-1339Issue(s): Whether under the implied preemption principles in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:07 am by Andrew Spillane
Taking the per se position on vertical territorial restraints was United States v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 9:51 am by Don T. Hibner, Jr.
This would appear to be an appeal to the venerable dicta of the Supreme Court in Continental Ore Co. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am by Christa Culver
(2) Does Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution? [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:05 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
The controversy was a prime case to examine whether Islamic law and liberal democracy can co-exist within a liberal constitutional framework. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Jack McNeill, Associate Library Director
Application of the remedial purpose canon to CERCLA successor liability issues after United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:56 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Today, Nov. 1999: To illustrate one issue in the interpretation of Continental Can, consider the discovery of buckyballs. [read post]