Search for: "United States v. Cores"
Results 221 - 240
of 3,433
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2011, 6:49 pm
Eugene Volokh links to United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 10:50 am
The State has filed the final brief in the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
Although the United States Supreme Court at one time interpreted the clause to bar admission of out-of-court statements that lacked adequate indicia of reliability (Ohio v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 11:45 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:10 am
In Ward v. [read post]
19 Dec 2024, 5:51 am
by Dennis Crouch The Senate Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Intellectual Property recently held a new hearing focusing on the RESTORE Patent Rights Act, a deceptively simple one-sentence bill that could dramatically reshape patent enforcement in the United States. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 10:00 pm
Sentencing Commission’s empirical staff’s criticisms of their recent article, which found, contrary to the Commission’s prior work, no evidence that racial disparity in sentences increased in response to United States v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 4:20 am
The complaint (full text) in Phelps v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 6:16 am
The discussion of First Amendment law integrates cases, questions and narrative to provide an in-depth understanding of the Religion Clauses of the United States Constitution. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:53 pm
United States; and Mr. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
On Thursday, Februrary 8, I sat in the courtroom of the Supreme Court of the United States on assignment for JURIST to hear oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:52 am
Lancaster, 45 F.3d 780, 789 (3d Cir.1995) (quoting United Mine Workers v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:47 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So holds United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 8:55 pm
Beyond that core holding, the opinion also implied two additional principles: first, that whether a noncitizen facing removal can claim procedural due process rights may depend on the existence of “established connections” with the United States, and second, that those due process rights are contingent on lawful admission. [read post]
14 May 2018, 5:49 pm
In its filings in the Supreme Court, the United States raised a new argument that it had not advanced in the court of appeals. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:34 pm
The United Nations Human Rights Council agrees. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 7:19 am
Ass’n v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 7:24 am
” The purpose of this provision is to avoid pleading in the alternative if a Court decides during the trial that the information is not a trade secret.This provision, adopted by other states from the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (USTA), has divided courts across the United States into three camps, although Maryland has not examined it in detail. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 2:18 am
The third case, United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. [read post]