Search for: "United States v. Cotton" Results 81 - 100 of 280
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2015, 6:12 am by Amy Howe
Pope Francis’s visit to the United States once again dominates Court-related news. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:17 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
  The nation-to-nation relationship we enjoy as tribal nations has never been confined to the borders of the United States. [read post]
6 May 2014, 5:11 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
The United States was founded in 1776, and our founding document is the Declaration of Independence that was unanimously adopted by the Congress of the United States. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 6:19 am
United States also recommended changes to domestic violence law and policy. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm by Dr. Elliot J. Feldman
The institutions, laws, and regulations of the United States convey control and formulation of trade policy into private hands. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 3:02 am
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey issued a Final Judgment ordering the TTAB to "transfer" to Piano Wellness LLC the application of Charlotte K. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 12:01 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
United States 13-632Issue: Whether forensic pathology reports are testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am by Gregory Dell
Long Term Disability Plan in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. [read post]
8 May 2014, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
”  In her column for The Washington Post, Ruth Marcus similarly decries the ruling, contending that, although the United States is “a predominantly Christian nation,” “we live here, too — we are Americans, too — and the Constitution, which prohibits elevating one religion over another, demands some sensitivity to this fact. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Region, 558 U.S. 67, 81 (2009) (quoting United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:59 am
Code § 2254(d) establishes the following as the standard court must apply in habeas cases:An application for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court shall not be granted with respect to any claim that was adjudicated on the merits in State court proceedings unless the adjudication of the claim —(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal… [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:58 am by Barbara Moreno
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Fisher, Louis, Reconsidering Judicial Finality: Why the Supreme Court is Not the Last Word on the Constitution (2019). [read post]