Search for: "United States v. Covington"
Results 41 - 60
of 178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2012, 9:07 pm
In United States v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 6:19 am
Its decision focused on the nature of the harm necessary for Article III standing as outlined in the United States Supreme Court’s 2016 Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 10:55 am
See United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:42 pm
The United States Supreme Court has now reversed that decision, in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:32 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit’s reasoning in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 7:44 am
The case, RILR v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am
Covington, 16-649, and – wait, we already did this one – North Carolina v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
The Supreme Court decision, Citizens United v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:22 pm
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit’s reasoning in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 7:02 am
/UK sanctions against the Trickbot cybercrime group, confirmation that Twitter’s sale will not be investigated by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), and the latest on Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 6:05 am
United States, and United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Last week, in Alasaad v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
United States, 318 U.S. 236, 244 (1943). [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
After 14 relists, the court issued a short per curiam opinion granting the government its requested vacatur of the court of appeals’ decision under United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 8:16 am
On Wednesday, November 29, the Court heard argument in Watters v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 6:49 pm
United States 17-7177 Issue: Whether, when a criminal defendant has already been convicted of an offense in a state criminal proceeding, the United States may thereafter prosecute the defendant for the same offense without violating the Fifth Amendment’s prohibition on double jeopardy. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 12:46 pm
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit in Liberty University v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm
House Resolution 676 was framed very broadly: The lawsuit could “seek any appropriate relief regarding the failure” of all executive-branch officials — including the president himself — “to act in a manner consistent with that official’s duties under the Constitution and laws of the United States with respect to implementation” of the ACA. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 5:34 am
That brings us to the new NC case, State v. [read post]
