Search for: "United States v. Crosby" Results 21 - 40 of 137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2023, 7:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
City of Salinas (Cal. 2009)), but today the Florida Court of Appeal interpreted the Florida statute differently (in Crosby v. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 9:17 am by Mavrick Law Firm
  For example, Florida’s Fifth District Court of Appeal evaluated this issue in Crosby Forrest Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
This chapter explores this general development through detailed consideration of the particular case of Pierce v State (1843) 13 NH 536. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 7:24 am by Eric Goldman
The court says there was no international terrorism here because “this shooting was committed by a lone shooter entirely within the United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 7:55 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (FTCA)Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:43 pm by Unknown
United States (FTCA)Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians v. [read post]
15 May 2021, 8:51 am by Shawn Dominy
  However, as a criminal defense lawyer, I have been asked about Qualified Immunity due to recent events in the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am by John Elwood
United States, 18-7449 Issues: (1) Whether a district court has the authority to reconsider the merits of a 28 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 3:23 pm by Adam Sanderson
Crosby Tugs, L.L.C., 911 F.3d 280 (5th Cir. 2018), the United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, ruled that the employer/vessel owner was not automatically liable for the malpractice of the physicians that treated a seaman who suffered a stroke while aboard their vessel. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 7:03 am by Steven Cohen
  In addition, Crosby states that the police tactical unit failed to follow its own policies of gathering intelligence before serving a search warrant. [read post]