Search for: "United States v. Crosby"
Results 41 - 60
of 128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2015, 4:01 am
”The bottom line: the court held that Rubeor’s term of office did not end when the Town Board adopted a resolution to withdraw from the CAP and that Rubeor held a right to continued employment until the expiration of his term of office.* Wright removed the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York but that court abstained from exercising jurisdiction pending the resolution of the underlying statutory dispute in state… [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
United States, 48 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 11:32 am
Facts: This case (Branson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 1:30 pm
Zepeda (Major Crimes Act, Indian Status)United States of America v. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 4:36 pm
Fifty years ago, in a landmark judgment (New York Times v Sullivan), the United States Supreme Court constitutionalised defamation law. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:15 am
STATE OF TEXAS, No. 14-0226 Disposed on orders list of May 8, 2015 CITY OF DALLAS v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:25 am
Rowland Perkins, II, Martin Bert Carter, Mark Crosby Nevdahl, and Ryan Allan RauchCase Number: 11-cv-01962 (United States District Court for the Central District of California)Case Filed: December 21, 2011Qualifying Judgment/Order: December 10, 2014 1/27/2015 4/27/2015 2015-3 SEC vs. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
. fails to satisfy one of the basic requirements for a class action,” Crosby v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:38 am
After a few more words, the lawyer ends by urging the court to put a stop to detention practices unworthy of the United States. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 3:04 am
The Co-op at 55 Crosby Street According to the complaint in Akasa (read here), the subject property is “a luxury cooperative designed by three well-known architects including Frank Gehry” located at 55 Crosby Street in the fashionable Soho district of Manhattan. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 12:02 pm
A word search shows this is only the fifth time a Supreme Court opinion has mentioned the WTO, along with Crosby v NFTC (2000), JEM Ag Supply v Pioneer Hi-Bred (2001), United Haulers v Oneida-Herkimer (2007), and Golan v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 6:49 am
United States when he said that the Constitution offered no protection for falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 9:56 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm
Crosby.) [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 5:32 am
See Vitesse, 771 F.Supp.2d at 309 (“[H]ere an agency of the United States is saying, in effect, ‘Although we claim that these defendants have done terrible things, they refuse to admit it and we do not propose to prove it, but will simply resort to gagging their right to deny it’ ”); see also Crosby v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:48 pm
See Vitesse, 771 F.Supp.2d at 309 (“[H]ere an agency of the United States is saying, in effect, ‘Although we claim that these defendants have done terrible things, they refuse to admit it and we do not propose to prove it, but will simply resort to gagging their right to deny it’ ”); see also Crosby v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 2:00 pm
In 2000, the Supreme Court ruled in Crosby v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 11:04 am
Of course, under United States v. [read post]
