Search for: "United States v. Cruz"
Results 1 - 20
of 412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2022, 2:00 am
McDonough, Brief of United States Senators Ted Cruz and Mike Lee as Amici Curiae in Support... [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:02 pm
If you're interested in some engaging opinion-writing, check out the majority and dissenting opinions in United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 10:14 am
United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
Supreme Court held in Arizona v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 2:20 pm
Cruz is currently the Solicitor General of Texas and recently argued Medellin for the State of Texas before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 6:01 pm
United States (the anti-commandeering principle)Clinton v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:47 am
Judge Tallman doesn't (right), in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 8:51 am
United States involves the First Step Act of 2018, which grants to federal district courts the power to resentence offenders convicted of distributing crack cocaine in light of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 1:30 pm
The post Cruz v. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
United States KJ 599/1 40 6/16/23 21-1052 United States ex rel. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
United States KJ 599/1 40 6/16/23 21-1052 United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:57 pm
Ted Cruz is currently the Solicitor General of Texas and recently argued Medellin for the State of Texas before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Dec 2006, 10:39 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 6:07 am
At no time was the United States Government or any federal official a party to any action.The particular proceeding that came to the Supreme Court as Medellin v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 9:32 am
United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968). [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 10:02 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 11:38 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:17 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 8:53 pm
Cruz, there was a flashback to the book-banning hypothetical. ] On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in FEC v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 4:40 am
According to markings on these documents, the e-mails were printed on August 8, 2009, in the United States. 85. [read post]
