Search for: "United States v. Cumberland"
Results 1 - 20
of 90
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2024, 4:30 am
The Court recently held oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm
Roberts (Cumberland; Google Scholar) reviews new works by Conor Clarke (Washington University; Google Scholar), Moore: The Overlooked Excise Power, 181 Tax Notes Fed. 1759 (Dec. 4, 2023) and Reuven Avi-Yonah (Michigan; Google Scholar), Effects from Moore: Does the Corporate Tax Require Realization, 182 Tax Notes Fed.... [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:21 am
State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:09 pm
Present during this was Oxford County Sheriff Christopher Wainwright and Androscoggin County Deputy Matthew Noyes, both are in my unit as well. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
United States, 143 Fed. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:59 am
State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:01 pm
Recently, JAMA Network Open published an epidemiologic study (“Williams study”) that explored whether exposure to Agent Orange amoby ng United States military veterans was associated with bladder cancer.[1] The reported study found little to no association, but lay and scientific journalists described the study as finding a “link,”[2] or a “tie,”[3] thus suggesting causality. [read post]
31 May 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Warren v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
The ratification debates and Federalist Papers can be supplemented by evidence of ordinary usage and by the constructions placed on the Constitution by the political branches and the states in the early years after its adoption. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
Although as was true with cases like United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 11:11 am
See, e.g., Raymond v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 11:11 am
See, e.g., Raymond v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 8:12 am
State v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 7:53 am
State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 4:48 am
State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court, yesterday the Court decided in Ramirez v. [read post]
15 Jan 2022, 3:13 pm
If they act beyond those powers, they act unconstitutionally, even if they act at the command of the President of the United States, the head of the Executive branch. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 7:25 am
The Democratic Party platform that election year called for the overturning of Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am
(1) Trial court’s instructions that the jury “will determine what the assault was” did not amount to an improper expression of opinion on the evidence in context; (2) The trial court’s response to a jury question during deliberations regarding a prior conviction was an not impermissible expression of opinion on the evidence State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 10:14 am
State v. [read post]
