Search for: "United States v. Cummings"
Results 21 - 40
of 258
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2021, 9:42 am
In United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 1:49 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy Today, Kennedy is frequently viewed as the Court’s swing vote on social issues and has consequently held special prominence in several politically-charged, highly anticipated 5 to 4 decisions, including the notorious Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 1:06 am
DC) where the the appointment of Margaret Peterlin to the position of Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office was alleged to be unlawful because she is not a "citizen of the United States who has a professional background and experience in patent or trademark law" as required under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 5:43 am
We recently discussed a troubling decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Porter v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am
United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2023 Argued: March 19, 2024 Decided: May 10, 2024 No. 23-1217 JASON DOHERTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am
United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2023 Argued: March 19, 2024 Decided: May 10, 2024 No. 23-1217 JASON DOHERTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 2:39 pm
The United States does not believe that Marcum factors apply or should be given as part of the instructions to panel members in cases where a violation of Article 133, UCMJ, is charged. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 6:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:08 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:29 pm
However, the United States Supreme Court in Reves v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:52 am
As the Supreme Court made clear in Nixon v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 7:38 am
Cummings & Kassie R. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Field played pivotal roles through their anti-disqualification decisions, including Cummings v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm
Mark Graber disputes the significance of the latest discovery of Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman related to whether the President is an Office of the United States for purposes of Section 3 of the fourteenth Amendment (Balkinization).ICYMI: The failed attempt to rename Brown v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 8:51 am
Metro Pavia Hospital, Inc. et al – United States District Court – District of Puerto Rico – July 26th, 2019) involves a claim of medical malpractice. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
With a conservative majority on the Supreme Court, the question everybody has been asking is what the future of abortion will look like in the United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:58 pm
(Eugene Volokh) No, says the district court in United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 6:38 pm
United States. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:02 am
In 1967, President Johnson nominated him to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
In the Court of Appeal Moses LJ, with whom Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony MR and Sullivan LJ agreed, concluded that the discrimination was indirect rather than direct. [read post]