Search for: "United States v. Cunningham"
Results 1 - 20
of 247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2007, 9:09 pm
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in the case of Cunningham v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 11:48 am
Guest blogger: Norah Cunningham, law student, University of San Francisco “Hands-on-the-Hips” Arguments: Replacing Legal Reasoning with an Underlying Rhetoric of Fear and Criminalization In my Legal Research, Writing and Analysis class, my professor cautioned my class of fresh-faced 1Ls against... [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 6:32 am
Cunningham did not address consecutive sentences under the DSL, which, as we will explain, can be imposed based on facts found by the trial court, without violating the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution.Download hernandez_from_ca.pdf [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:37 pm
Eugene Volokh at The Volokh Conspiracy comments on the Eleventh Circuit's recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 11:30 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
United States, now pending before the U.S. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:18 am
United States v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 5:00 am
See Cunningham Charter Corp. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 11:39 am
United States v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 5:32 pm
Frawley (available here), begins this way:This case is before us for a second time, after remand from the United States Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of its recent opinion in Cunningham v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:35 am
It starts with this notable sentence: "The California sentencing law that the Court strikes down today is indistinguishable in any constitutionally significant respect from the advisory Guidelines scheme that the Court approved in United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 11:25 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 11:25 am
On the other hand, I’ve seen other appellate opinions do the same thing (see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 9:08 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 1:29 pm
” Craig Cunningham v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 8:20 am
In Cunningham v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 3:44 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:02 am
Citing People v Weaver (12 NY3d 433) and United States v Jones (132 S Ct 945}, the Court of Appeals ruled that the State agency's action was a search within the meaning of the State and Federal Constitutions and “did not require a warrant” but “on the facts of this case such surveillance was unreasonable”The decision TLC decision is posted on the Internet… [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 3:37 pm
In United States v. [read post]
