Search for: "United States v. Cunningham" Results 21 - 40 of 261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2015, 5:02 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Citing People v Weaver (12 NY3d 433) and United States v Jones (132 S Ct 945}, the Court of Appeals ruled that the State agency's action was a search within the meaning of the State and Federal Constitutions and “did not require a warrant” but “on the facts of this case such surveillance was  unreasonable”The decision TLC decision is posted on the Internet… [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 5:57 pm
The California Supreme Court — acting only 16 days after the nation's highest court humbled it with Jan. 22's Cunningham v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:26 am by Matt C. Bailey
On April 21, 2010, the Ninth Circuit ruled that a Federal court’s CAFA jurisdiction is not contingent on certification of a class in United Steel v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:05 am
The ALJ ruled that the GPS data was accurate and reliable and that its use did not violate Halpin’s privacy rights under the United States Constitution. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:41 pm
United States, 546 U.S. 12 (2005) makes this rule non-jurisdictional. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:15 pm by Brian Shiffrin
" Then, Chief Judge Lippman wrote that there is no material difference between the California statute struck down by the United States Supreme Court in Cunningham v California (549 US 270 [2007]) "and our persistent felony offender sentencing statutes. [read post]